Starting from the sexual norm definition doctors explain us what impotence is, and, guided by these considerations, they prescribe Edegra or don’t. So a medical definition becomes a lever of power of a physician over a patient, although medicine is not a source of authoritative judgments about the sexual life. Quite the contrary: medical ideas about sexuality are in constant evolution, which looks more like a chaos. So, yesterday homosexuality was considered a somatic disease, today it is a variant of the norm. So what can we say about such delicate and subjective matters, as the frequency and quality of erection. Here science gives a too wide field for interpretations. Edegra can help here. And helpless sexologists’ statements that an individual rate can vary widely, cause in patients only neurosis instead of confidence.
Some of them then use Edegra. In general, any sexologist would confirm that a doctor in this situation is the last man whose advice an afflicted will ask for. Because our contemporary has many other, more affordable and authoritative sources from which he draws notions about the normal or the desired in the sexual sphere, confirming or refuting his own suspicions and fears. Realizing his sexual behavior a man is guided by a wide variety of reasons, most of which are formed under constant pressure from the outside (from the received education up to role models, assimilated through the media). That can make him take Edegra. The most severe dictator and the real ruler of minds is perhaps the mass culture. And this despite the fact that it does not claim, as opposed to a doctor, at the role of authority and does not give an unambiguous answer to the question of what is normal sexual behavior. Indeed most of people chooses that what they are constantly put in their heads, that for which they don’t need to reach a bookshelf as a mold due to which an own ego is measured.